Mughal Legal System: Emperor, Qazis, and Muftis

 Introduction: Law as an Instrument of Imperial Governance

The Mughal Empire represents one of the most sophisticated experiments in governance in pre-modern South Asia. While Mughal military organization, architecture, and cultural patronage are frequently discussed, the legal system that sustained imperial authority over a vast and diverse population often receives comparatively less attention. The Mughal legal system was neither a rigid theocracy nor a purely customary arrangement. It was a carefully balanced structure in which imperial authority, Islamic legal learning, and local practices coexisted within a coherent administrative framework.

At the center of this system stood the Emperor, whose authority was supreme in matters of governance and justice. Supporting this authority was a structured body of legal officials, most prominently the qazis and the muftis, who played crucial roles in adjudication, legal interpretation, and administration of justice. Together, these institutions ensured order, legitimacy, and continuity across a territorially expansive and socially plural empire.

This blog examines the Mughal legal system with a focused analysis of the roles played by

the Emperor, qazis, and muftis. It situates these institutions within their historical context, explains their legal functions, and evaluates their contribution to Indian legal history. The discussion is intentionally detailed and paragraph-based, written for law students, aspirants, and readers interested in legal history, while remaining fully compliant with AdSense and academic standards.

Read Also : Introduction of Muslim Law in India

Historical Context: Emergence of the Mughal Legal Order

The Mughal legal system did not arise in a vacuum. It evolved from earlier Indo-Islamic administrative practices established under the Delhi Sultanate and refined through Central Asian and Persian influences. When Babur laid the foundations of Mughal rule, the empire inherited a legal culture that combined Islamic law, royal ordinances, and local customary norms. Over time, particularly during the reign of Akbar, this inherited structure was reorganized into a more systematic and inclusive legal order.

The vast territorial reach of the Mughal Empire required a legal system that could operate uniformly while accommodating regional diversity. Absolute centralization was impractical, yet excessive decentralization threatened imperial authority. The Mughal solution lay in a hierarchical but flexible legal framework in which imperial sovereignty guided legal norms, qazis administered justice locally, and muftis provided authoritative legal opinions.

The Emperor as the Supreme Source of Law

In the Mughal legal system, the Emperor occupied a position of unparalleled authority. He was not merely the head of state but also the ultimate fountain of justice. All legal authority flowed from the Emperor, and judicial officials derived their powers through imperial appointment. This arrangement reflected the Mughal conception of sovereignty, where political legitimacy was inseparable from the obligation to ensure justice.

The Emperor exercised judicial authority in multiple ways. He acted as the highest appellate authority, hearing petitions directly from subjects through the system of royal audience. These petitions, often referred to as arz-i-dasht, allowed individuals from all social backgrounds to seek redress for grievances, including complaints against powerful officials. The Emperor’s intervention in such cases reinforced the idea that justice was accessible and not monopolized by elites.

Imperial decrees, known as farmans, constituted an important source of law. These orders addressed matters ranging from revenue administration and land rights to criminal punishment and public order. While farmans were not legislative codes in the modern sense, they carried binding legal force throughout the empire. Their authority derived from the Emperor’s sovereign power rather than from religious doctrine.

Relationship Between Imperial Authority and Islamic Law

Although the Mughal rulers were Muslims, their legal authority was not confined strictly within the framework of Islamic jurisprudence. The Emperor was not considered a mujtahid or independent interpreter of Islamic law, yet his administrative and judicial decisions often operated alongside, and sometimes beyond, classical fiqh. This duality created a distinctive legal order in which sharia principles informed justice, but imperial necessity shaped its application.

Akbar’s reign marked a significant moment in this evolution. His emphasis on sulh-i-kul, or universal peace, reflected a legal philosophy grounded in tolerance and inclusivity. While qazis continued to adjudicate personal law matters according to Islamic principles, imperial policy ensured that non-Muslim subjects were governed without religious discrimination. This balance preserved the authority of Islamic legal institutions while allowing the state to function effectively in a plural society.

Also Read : Administration of Justice during the Delhi Sultanate

Qazis: Judicial Officers of the Mughal State

Qazis were the primary judicial officials in the Mughal legal system. Appointed by the Emperor or his provincial representatives, they were responsible for administering justice at various territorial levels, including the sarkar and pargana. Their jurisdiction extended over civil disputes, criminal cases, family law matters, and issues relating to inheritance and contracts.

The authority of the qazi was grounded in both religious learning and imperial sanction. A qazi was expected to possess sound knowledge of Islamic jurisprudence, moral integrity, and administrative competence. However, unlike in purely theocratic systems, the Mughal qazi functioned as a state official rather than an independent religious authority. His decisions were subject to administrative oversight, and misconduct could lead to dismissal or punishment.

In practice, qazis played a crucial role in maintaining legal order at the local level. They heard disputes, examined evidence, recorded judgments, and supervised legal documentation. Their courts provided a formal forum for dispute resolution, reducing reliance on private vengeance or informal coercion.

Jurisdiction and Procedure of Qazi Courts

The procedural functioning of qazi courts reflected a blend of Islamic legal principles and administrative pragmatism. Cases were initiated through complaints presented by litigants. Evidence included oral testimony, written documents, and, in some cases, oath-taking. The qazi evaluated evidence in accordance with established legal norms while ensuring that proceedings remained efficient.

Although Islamic law influenced substantive decisions, procedural flexibility was a defining feature. Local customs were often considered, particularly in land and commercial disputes. This adaptability enhanced the legitimacy of the judicial process and ensured that justice remained contextually relevant.

Appeals against qazi decisions could be made to higher administrative authorities or, in exceptional cases, directly to the Emperor. This appellate structure reinforced accountability and limited the potential for judicial arbitrariness.

Muftis: Interpreters of Law and Legal Advisors

Muftis occupied a distinct but complementary position within the Mughal legal system. Unlike qazis, muftis did not generally adjudicate disputes. Their primary function was to issue legal opinions, known as fatwas, on questions of Islamic law. These opinions guided qazis in complex cases and assisted administrators in understanding legal principles.

The authority of a mufti derived from scholarly expertise rather than executive power. Muftis were respected for their mastery of jurisprudence and their ability to interpret legal texts in light of contemporary circumstances. In Mughal administration, their role was advisory, ensuring that judicial decisions aligned with recognized legal doctrines.

Fatwas issued by muftis were not automatically binding. Their persuasive value depended on the credibility of the scholar and the acceptance of the opinion by judicial authorities. This arrangement allowed for interpretive diversity while maintaining doctrinal coherence.

Interaction Between Qazis and Muftis

The relationship between qazis and muftis was collaborative rather than hierarchical. In difficult cases involving intricate points of law, qazis sought guidance from muftis. This consultation strengthened the quality of judicial reasoning and reduced the risk of erroneous judgments.

This interaction illustrates an early form of legal specialization. While qazis focused on adjudication and procedure, muftis concentrated on interpretation and doctrine. Together, they ensured that justice was informed by both practical considerations and scholarly rigor.

Criminal Justice Under the Mughals

Criminal law under the Mughal system combined Islamic principles with imperial regulations. Serious offenses such as murder, theft, and rebellion were treated with severity, reflecting the state’s emphasis on public order. Qazis handled criminal cases within their jurisdiction, but imperial officials often supervised enforcement.

The Emperor retained ultimate control over criminal justice. In politically sensitive cases or matters affecting state security, imperial courts exercised direct authority. This centralized control prevented fragmentation of criminal law and reinforced the supremacy of imperial justice.

Civil and Personal Law

In civil matters, particularly those relating to marriage, divorce, inheritance, and contracts, qazis applied Islamic law to Muslim litigants. Non-Muslim communities were generally allowed to follow their own customary laws, administered through local institutions. This pluralistic approach reduced social tension and acknowledged India’s cultural diversity.

Muftis played a key role in clarifying legal questions arising in personal law, especially in cases involving conflicting interpretations. Their advisory opinions ensured consistency without imposing rigid uniformity.

Administrative Oversight and Accountability

Despite their authority, qazis and muftis operated under imperial supervision. Corruption, bias, or incompetence could result in removal from office. The Emperor’s commitment to justice extended to monitoring judicial officials, reinforcing the principle that law applied equally to subjects and administrators alike.

This emphasis on accountability distinguishes the Mughal legal system from purely feudal arrangements. Judicial office was a public trust rather than a hereditary privilege.

Contribution to Indian Legal History

The Mughal legal system represents a critical stage in the evolution of Indian law. It demonstrated that a centralized state could administer justice across diverse populations without enforcing rigid uniformity. The roles of the Emperor, qazis, and muftis illustrate a sophisticated division of legal authority that balanced sovereignty, scholarship, and administration.

Many features of this system influenced later legal developments, including British colonial administration, which adapted Mughal revenue and judicial practices to its own framework. The Mughal experience thus forms an essential bridge between medieval and modern legal traditions in India.

Conclusion

The Mughal legal system was a complex and functional arrangement in which imperial authority, judicial administration, and legal scholarship worked in tandem. The Emperor served as the ultimate guardian of justice, qazis ensured accessible adjudication, and muftis provided intellectual guidance. Together, they created a legal order that was stable, adaptable, and remarkably effective for its time.

Understanding this system is essential for appreciating the historical foundations of Indian law. It reveals that principles such as accountability, access to justice, and legal pluralism were not foreign impositions but integral elements of indigenous governance long before the modern era.

Read Also : Legal Reforms under Sher Shah Suri